Amazon UK £1.99 £10.99
Amazon US $2.49 $12.99
Amazon CA $17.09
This title was shortlisted for the March Book of the Month
Biographical Fiction
Biographical Fiction
1609 James I
England
‘Orphaned
Lucy St. John, described as "the most beautiful of all," defies
English society by carving her own path through the decadent Stuart court. In
1609, the early days of the rule of James I are a time of glittering pageantry
and cutthroat ambition, when the most dangerous thing one can do is fall in
love . . . or make an enemy of Frances Howard, the reigning court beauty.’
“…The kept must have their keepers…”
The era of King James I of England is
often, apart from the Gunpowder Plot, a neglected period of history where novels
are concerned. It is a period of transition from Tudor to Stuart where pageantry
rides alongside sexual ‘entertainment’ and the difficulty of keeping your head,
virginity and sanity are all as difficult as each other to accomplish. Suitable marriages
were all that concerned the women, and woe betide them if they failed their
goal.
Written from the viewpoint of Lucy St John
- and yes the name is the same, she was an ancestor of the author. Lucy is an
intelligent woman with a knowledge of plants and herbs, giving her access to
the medications of the time so that she soon makes a name for herself. We
follow her life through romance at Court and her subsequent marriage to Sir
Allen Aspley, Constable of the Tower, and the Royal Navy’s chief quartermaster.
One of his duties is the care and feeding of the prisoners. We also meet the
real-life characters of Walter Raleigh, George Villiers and Frances Howard, who
variously appear as courtiers or ‘King’s guests’ within the Tower.
Elizabeth St John brings these years of
Stuart England to the fore, bringing the known facts of her ancestor’s life together with richly
imagined scenes creating in the process a believable heroine, an intriguing
plot and an enjoyable novel.
© Anne Holt
I am eager to read this one! Thanks for the review.
ReplyDeleteIt does sound good doesn't it? Thanks for dropping by Samantha
DeleteThank you for your interest Samantha!
DeleteThank you, Helen,for this review. The period is of interest and I will add this publication to my read list. Keep up the good work and I believe that it would be immensely valuable to have a clone of Helen Hollick - one to read and review, and the other to continue writing. All the best.
ReplyDeleteI could do with a few clones myself LOL
DeleteThank you Stanley, I hope you enjoy the read. Personally, I think they broke the mould after Helen, but I'd be the first to agree!
Delete