Monday, 15 October 2018

The Mid-Month Extra with Mary Anne Yarde and the Great Arthurian Writers

In 1846 William John Thoms, a British writer, penned a letter to The Athenaeum, a British Magazine. In this letter, he talked about “popular antiquities.” But instead of calling it by its common name, he used a new term — folklore.

What did Thoms mean by this new word?

The word folk referred to the rural poor who were for the most part illiterate. Lore means instruction. So folklore means 'to instruct the poor'. But we understand it as verbal storytelling.

If folklore is just storytelling, is there any truth in the story of King Arthur and his Knights?
In this article, I going to take a look at one of the great Arthurian Writers. I will also try to answer the question I just posed.

"Wave after wave, each mightier than the last,
Till last, a ninth one, gathering half the deep
And full of voices, slowly rose and plunged
Roaring, and all the wave was in a flame:
And down the wave and in the flame was borne
A naked babe, and rode to Merlin’s feet,
Who stoopt and caught the babe, and cried "The King!
Here is an heir for Uther!"

The above quote was taken from Tennyson’s Idylls of the King and the place Tennyson was referring to was none other than Merlin’s Cave in Cornwall. The cave itself sits under Tintagel Castle, and if you have the slightest interest in Arthur, then I am sure you have heard of Tintagel. If you ever get the chance to visit therel, then do. It is a stunning location, well worth checking out.

Who was Lord Tennyson?

Alfred Tennyson, 1st Baron Tennyson, (6 August 1809 – 6 October 1892) was the Poet Laureate of Great Britain and Ireland during much of Queen Victoria’s reign. Lord Tennyson was appointed to the position of Poet Laureate in 1850, after the death of William Wordsworth, and he is mostly remembered for his great work — The Charge of the Light Brigade. But I am interested in him because he also published an Arthurian inspired epic poem between 1859 and 1885 and he called it, as I have already said, The Idylls of King.

Now anyone who writes about Arthur, myself included, draws on the work of the Great Arthurian Poets, and Tennyson was no different. But his poem was so epic that he split it into twelve parts, and each part dealt with a different aspect of the Arthurian tale — however, he gave his stories a slight Victorian twist!

Tintagel Castle and Merlin’s Cave.

Geoffrey of Monmouth had already given us Tintagel Castle as the birthplace of Arthur. Tennyson took this one step further, and I can understand why he did. There is a cave under Tintagel Castle, and this cave was begging to be included in the tale. The cave in question fills up with water at every high tide, and it is easy enough to imagine Merlin approaching the cave with a shining staff in his hand, lighting his way. If Merlin were to have a cave, then this would be it. This unknown cave became a tourist attraction that suddenly had a long association with Arthurian legend — it was just that no one knew about it until Tennyson told us!

Another Arthurian location...

I don’t know about you, but I love checking out film locations. I am lucky enough that I live very near some Poldark film locations. I have also travelled around Scotland checking out the Outlander film locations. Now I am sure you would not disagree with me when I say that neither Poldark or Outlander scream folklore. But when we put the same principles into Arthur’s story then there are some startling similarities because, let’s be honest, if you are going to visit an Arthurian location, it isn’t the same as spending the day at, I don’t know, Hampton Court. You are instead visiting book locations, folklore locations. 

However, saying that, visiting Arthurian book locations doesn’t feel the same, as visiting the locations of Poldark, Outlander or even Game of Thrones for that matter, because we recognise them as stories, but when it comes to Arthur, we don’t do that. The folklore is so ingrained into our culture that we just kind of accept it as maybe not fact, but something very close. And the reason for this is simply because Geoffrey of Monmouth’s great work in the 12th Century was a must read. A factual, must read. And that is where the problem lies with Arthurian folklore. For centuries we were told these stories were true and somewhere ingrained deep down inside us is the belief that they are. Of course, over the centuries there are plenty of people who have exploited the Arthurian story — the monks of Glastonbury Abbey being one of them. But just think on this, a thousand years ago the people of Britain were making pilgrimages — we would probably call it a holiday, or a day out — to these sites that were associated with Arthur and we are still doing it, after all this time. Isn’t that incredible? Arthur is still drawing in the crowds, and I believe that he will continue to draw in the crowds long after we have forgotten all about Poldark and Outlander and even, dare I say it, Jon Snow from Game of Thrones. And that, my friends, is the power of folklore. It is not the same as a book, it isn’t the same as factual history. It evolves, and we accept it. Suddenly Tennyson’s version of events seems as old as time. Merlin always had a cave...didn’t he? It is humbling when you think about it.

© Mary Anne Yarde

So your thoughts on the Matter of Arthur. Leave a comment below...


  1. Thank you, Mary Anne for this - and Helen, too, for hosting it. The story of Arthur is probably the oldest and enduring story in the world; not just for its longevity, but because people like yourself (and, indeed, your host!) keep adding to it, bringing new perspectives, fleshing out well known yet somehow shadowy figures. I do agree with you about its standing in comparison with the likes of Poldark/GoT etc - it is head and shoulders above them.
    It is not only timeless, but also endless.

    1. Thank you Richard, as many readers and visitors to #DDRevs might know I am not a fan of the 'traditional' Arthur story - knights in armour, holy grail etc (sorry, I can't stand Lancelot) which is why I set my own trilogy in the 5th century post-Roman era with no mention of fantasy, myth, knights or Merlin, but I do enjoy Mary Anne's novels, she is a talented writer and refreshingly different, and that, I think, is the key to Arthur - there are no facts to follow where he is concerned so individual writers are unrestricted in what they want to write. Long live Arthur (and Gwenhwyfar, as I call her)

    2. I never liked Lancelot, which is why I like BC's take on the tale!! I am quite happy with any version of the overall tale magic or no magic, if its well written than it adds to the mystique which adds to its perpetuation!

    3. Thank you, Richard, for your kind words! And a big thank you to Helen, for inviting me onto Discovering Diamond!

  2. Thank you for an enjoyable post, Mary Anne! I've been an Arthurian fan girl for as far back as I can remember, not so much for the Grail stories. I more prefer these stories when they're grounded in a plausible historical setting.
    PS to Helen: Blogger is being agreeable for me this morning (so far).

    1. Thank you, Cryssa, for your kind words! I am glad you enjoyed the post!

  3. What a wonderful post, Mary Anne. I am half way through book 4 of your series. I think this one is my favorite!

  4. Thank you, Beatrice. I am so glad you are enjoying The Du Lac Prophecy.


WARNING: Spammers will be composted